Talk:Microphone practice

Professional sound production Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

MS = mono/stereo?

Doesn't MS stand for mono/stereo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.168.225.191 (talk) 14:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but not usually. One microphone gives the Mid (L+R), the other gives the Side (L-R) - basically same as FM broadcasting#FM_stereo.

Given that you can progressively attenuate the Side (L-R), it gives you a countinuously-variable stereo width, so it can collapse to mono, so your suggestion has some logic, but it's not the usual meaning !

--195.137.93.171 (talk) 04:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

binaural ILD and ITD

Explain ? --195.137.93.171 (talk) 06:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MS compatibility

I removed the following text:

There is some controversy as to whether MS micing technique can create translation issues when used with matrix encoded cinema surround formats such as Dolby SR LtRt, which relies on phase relationships between left and right channels of the stereo recording in order to decode surround information.

It was placed below the references in non-standard position, and it did not have any cites to support it. If there is indeed a controversy it should be easy to find published sources. Binksternet (talk) 04:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The MS is not compatible, as is, with mixing for film. LtRt and multi-channel too. Why? Simply because there is a delay applied to the surround in theaters (technically too complicated to explain here). There is little or no written references but all sound re-recording mixer experience this problem. Regards.Wfplb (talk) 12:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right! For there to be controversy, somebody would have to be pushing MS as compatible for film. Binksternet (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the OP that this text snippet is wrong. In fact, MS is the preferred stereo technique among location recording engineers. Moreover, since MS does _not_ introduce any artificial run-time differences, it is actually more robust in the presence of matrix encoding than spaced pairs.

If MS did not work with any matrix encoding, then pan-potted mono sounds would not work either, which means that if the statement were true, you could not use mixing desks for sound production. Not likely :-D Will remove the snippet again. Nettings (talk) 22:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ORTF technique

Why isn't the ORTF technique included as a separate technique vs. a brief mention under A-B, especially since the A-B section says it use omnis while the ORTF article says it uses cardioids? Misty MH (talk) 20:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC) Misty MH (talk) 20:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold and make ORTF into a separate technique. Binksternet (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I too think that ORTF technique should be in this article as a separate technique. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:BBB0:300:6D8D:C56A:3FA2:4A6E (talk) 19:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

legality of covert recording (microphone placement)

There are many regulations regarding microphone placement and participation of knowledge of one party that a recording is taking place to be regarded as "legal". For example, surveillance systems in businesses (in some states) are required to have unconcealed microphones. I'm searching for this or other such references to the legality of recording practices. There is a scant amount of information in Legality_of_recording_by_civilians#Voice_recording. -RR — Preceding unsigned comment added by RotogenRay (talk • contribs) 18:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Microphone practice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]