Jump to content

Talk:Controversial Reddit communities

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Michael Brutsch)

Add r/TrueVirgin

[edit]

I think this subreddit is controversial Ambndms (talk) 00:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ambndms: Are there reliable sources that verify this though? - Aoidh (talk) 01:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoidh I can't find any non-reddit sources to support this yet. The subreddit itself is self-explanatorily controversial (though I know this doesn't help my case). I'll keep this on my radar in case something manifests. Thank you!
- Ambndms (talk) 01:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I dont expect that sub to stay up for long. Trade (talk) 21:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Welp its gone now Trade (talk) 12:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Controversial Reddit communities

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Controversial Reddit communities's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "WaPo":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT 12:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

add r/sino

[edit]

same hate as r/genzedong and full of pro ccp propaganda

source: https://time.com/6121915/reddit-international-hate-speech/ Rynoip (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 22:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, this is not a edit request, Im just stating I added r/sino. Sorry for not making it clear. Rynoip (talk) 03:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

r/politics r/whitepeopletwitter r/palestine etc

[edit]

There should be a section for major subreddits cosplaying as normative while spewing Nazi Muslim Palestinian propaganda. The fact that reddit doesn't take care of them nor ban clearly racist and antisemite users speaks volume of what entities are currently controlling the reddit moderation. 174.91.170.198 (talk) 20:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources, then we'll add them Babysharkboss2!! (No Life 'Til Leather) 13:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Critics argue"

[edit]

Taken from the (currently) 4th paragraph: "Critics argue that while concerned Redditors and moderators often report these subs, they often remain open until a specific incident, or the actions of an individual, forces them to come under more intense scrutiny and requires administrators to decide between allowing distasteful content or suppressing dangerous or destructive communities."

How come this article mentions "critics" who think subs they don't like can't be banned fast enough - without even providing a single source for those "critics" in the entire paragraph - while completely ignoring the vast amounts of other "critics" who criticize the censorship? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.55.24 (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done This is a general complaint, not a specific request. If you are interested in adding information about "criticism of censorship", then you need to find reliable, independent sources that document and explain it. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]