Talk:Mexico–United States international park
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Possible issues
[edit]- Should be Mexico–United States International Park
- Take a closer look at how this article fits with WP:CRYSTALBALL?
— Stevey7788 (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments.
Should be Mexico–United States International Park
I'm happy for the title to be capitalised if needs be, but please note that the park has been referred to under a number of different names historically, so the current title may be better as it clearly describes the subject rather than pretending to be a canonical name for it (of which none yet exists).Take a closer look at how this article fits with WP:CRYSTALBALL?
The article is still not much more than a stub, so I think I can see how the CRYSTALBALL concern might have arisen. I have now edited it slightly to indicate that the park is partly complete, but should probably clarify that further. Anyhow, so far, the article focuses on the history of the park: what was proposed, when, and by whom, and in this way avoids CRYSTALBALL. In any case, WP:GNG seems to be met, and there are numerous sources available: "International+Park"+"mexico"+("u.s."+OR+"united+states")+border&safe=off. I hope this allays your concern.
- Thanks again, Zazpot (talk) 19:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- I've given this some careful thought and looked over it closely. Looks good so far with reliable sources and good writing. I've marked it as reviewed. Keep up the good work! — Stevey7788 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Photo size
[edit]I think the photo size is too big. Can it be smaller?113.197.13.138 (talk) 07:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)