Talk:Terminal Aérea metro station

Terminal Aérea metro station was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 4, 2020	Good article nominee	Not listed

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Metro Terminal Aérea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Nomination failed (withdrawn)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Metro Terminal Aérea/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Username6892 (talk · contribs) 16:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Username6892, and I will be reviewing this article. I may give some comments before completing the review. Username⁶⁸⁹² 16:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Location

On their Policy Review of Mexico, OECD criticized the location for not being tourist-friendly.[6] On the page number given, the criticism is about the station design and lack of information rather than the location. (2c)

Reworded.

It also serves colonias Peñón de los Baños and Moctezuma 2ª sección Is there an English translation for this? (1a)

I can change colonia to neighborhood (with a link to colonia), but in the strict sense, I can't translate proper names. While "Moctezuma Second Section" might be understandable "Crag of the Bathrooms" is not. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 18:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- - If it is just a proper name it should be fine Username⁶⁸⁹² 18:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Station layout

Not cited (2c)

Removed

History and construction

Between Oceanía–Terminal Aérea stretch, the track goes from surface to underground,[10] ref 10 says that it's between Terminal Aerea and Hangares (2c), also, change it to "Between Oceanía (or Hangares because that's what the source says) and Terminal Aérea, the track runs from the surface to an underground tunnel" (1a)

Source 10 says: "En el tramo Oceanía-Puerto Aéreo se localiza la transición de vía superficial o en tajo a subterránea, y a ese nivel quedan las estaciones Terminal Aérea y Hangares, así como el tramo que las une, cuya estructura fue construida con el sistema de muros Milán." Transliterally it says "In the Oceanía-Puerto Aéreo--the avenue--stretch the ground-level to underground transition is located, and at that level--it refers to underground--Terminal Aérea and Hangares stations are located, like the stretch that connects them, whose structure of diaphragm wall was built by the Milan method".--I could add this last part I forgot. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 18:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm getting confused by this. Perhaps I need a 2nd opinion. Username⁶⁸⁹² 19:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any problem with that. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 19:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Landmarks

Four murals, titled Paisajes cálidos y fríos,[20] are located at the end of each platform (Cálidos in the northern walls and Fríos in the southern walls);[10] ref 10 doesn't support the content (although the attached pdf might) (2c)
"and murales en los vestíbulos y las cabeceras de los andenes ... el de la cabecera sur, “Paisajes Cálidos”, y el de la cabecera norte, ”Paisajes Fríos”." -> "and murals in the lobbies and platform headers(?) ... southbound, Warm landscapes, and northbound Cold landscapes--which I wrote backward and now make more geographic sense". I don't know if there's an English word for these walls which are called "cabeceras". © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 18:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The other two murals, named Tlaltilco (east corridor) and Cuitzeo (west corridor),[10][20] are located in the station corridors.[10] refs don't seem to support that they're locatied within the station corridors (2c)
Changed to lobby, because it says vestíbulo.
Terminal Aérea is briefly mentioned in the Aníbal Ricci book Fear (2007) when the protagonist arrives at the Airport and asks for directions to the city center.[24] Seems trivial (3b)

Removed.

Images

I don't think the gallery is needed.

Removed.

Overall

Before I place this on hold, I will request a 2nd opinion for the exit list as well as if this is a reliable source.

Removed, it was here before I edited it. I didn't notice it was Blogspot. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 18:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion from Vami IV

Robert Schwandl/UrbanRail seems credible to me. UrbanRail is self-published, and that's not good, but its author is a noted publisher on the subject of rail transport. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 05:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vami IV: There is a part in the history/construction that I need a 2nd opinion on. Username⁶⁸⁹² 14:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aha. This section should not be bullet-points. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 21:19, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vami IV: Are you still planning on giving the 2nd opinion? (It's been a week) Username⁶⁸⁹² 02:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had given it, but here it is in full: the exits should not be listed, but discussed, and moved into a larger discussion of the terminal layout. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 03:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, i withdraw the nomination. Libraries are closed so I cannot access the Metro's building plan. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 04:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Vami IV: I was talking about some confusion I had over spanish to english translation, though given that the nom was withdrawn (I'm not sure whether to mark as failed), it likely won't matter until it is renominated. Username⁶⁸⁹² 16:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress

{{User:RMCD bot/multimove|1=Terminal Aérea metro station|2=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#

headerstylebackground:#CCCCFF;
contentstyleborder:1px #ccf solid; padding:10px;

There is a move discussion in progress on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#{{hidden/FC|headerstylebackground:#CCCCFF;|contentstyleborder:1px #ccf solid; padding:10px;|headerArticles|content|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]