Jump to content

Talk:Metro Cebu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

'Metro Cebu'

[edit]

page created 2/07/06


RDC enlarges Metro Cebu

[edit]

Sun.Star Cebu October 8, 2005

"Development planners expanded the definition of Metro Cebu to include the towns of San Fernando and Carcar in the south and Danao City in the north.

This way, the Regional Development Council (RDC) 7 hopes to improve the local governments’ capability to address traffic congestion, solid waste management and threats to peace and order.

“We can come together and discuss projects. These projects can be realistically planned and implemented with the active cooperation of all the local government units (LGUs),” said Cebu Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia during the RDC full council meeting yesterday.

RDC enlarges Metro Cebu See also: Official Website of San Fernando Cebu

Enlarge metro for mass transit: plan Sun.Star Cebu By Charmaine Y. Rodriguez Sun.Star Staff Reporter October 21, 2004

DANAO City and the towns of Carcar and San Fernando will be added to Metro Cebu to make the introduction of a mass transit system viable.

The mass transit system is one of the priority programs in the Regional Development Plan for 2005 to 2010, said National Economic and Development Authority (Neda) 7 Director Romeo Escandor.

The project promotes the growth of Metro Cebu, which supports the national policy on “national dispersion through regional concentration,” a Neda 7 report stated.

In the Regional Spatial Development Strategy, the development of Metro Cebu is “foreseen to propel the rapid growth of the region and its provinces.”

President Arroyo’s 10-point agenda includes the decentralization of progress through improvements in transportation.

Question

[edit]

---Just a question or two: What's the basis for the list of the member cities and municipalities? Was there an organization in charge of designating officially what towns are or will be included as part of Metro Cebu? The article lacks information in this area. Another thing is the History section. The Creation subsection needs an information on the growth of the metro since traditionally and historically, (and on most people's mind especially those outside the region) Metro Cebu refers only to the area consisting of the cities of Cebu, Mandaue and Lapu-Lapu. Talisay maybe is a fresh addition (as stated in the Cebu City article). Is the present composition really legally defined by the Metropolitan Cebu Development Council? Claiming Metro Cebu as "the largest metropolis in terms of land area" in the Philippines maybe is taking it too far. Let's just be conservative with the information presentation. Information consistency of is of utmost importance since this article will have repercussions everywhere. This link gives further insights on the issue http://www3.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps9815.pdf--Jordz 12:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answers for Metro Cebu;s definition by MCDC are available now at the current page of Metro Cebu. Metro Cebu's land area (998.0 km²) is bigger than Metro Manila's land area (636 km²) thus, naming it the largest metropolis in the Philippines is correct.

Districts

[edit]

Does anyone know the number of districts in Metro Cebu?

Metro Cebu Districts

[edit]

Metro Cebu covers 4-5 congressional districts:

Cebu City --> two districts

Mandaue, Lapu-Lapu, Consolacion, Cordova --> 6th district of Cebu province

(Danao City), Compostela, Liloan, plus 8 more municipalities --> 5th district (minor part)

Talisay City, Minglanilla, Naga, (San Fernando), (Carcar), plus one more municipality --> 1st district (major part)

2005 pop

[edit]

the 814,296 population for Cebu City is an updated one for 2005 and not 2000 census. Please correct. thanks. :)

Most of the other cities/municipalities were using 2000 populations. We should stick to 2000 populations unless a newer, official estimate for all the other units becomes available. Polaron | Talk 13:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cebu Events

[edit]

Pls add to external links: www.cebuevents.com. it is a free guide to all events in metro cebu. thank you!

spam Cdvl (talk) 09:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Danao-City logo.png

[edit]

Image:Danao-City logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LUDO&LUYM.jpg

[edit]

Image:LUDO&LUYM.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:VISION-THEATER.jpg

[edit]

Image:VISION-THEATER.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comprise

[edit]

The reason for my 13 Sep edit was that the existing text made it sound like Metro Cebu was something within Cebu City ("Metro Cebu ... is located in Cebu City ..."). So I changed it in an attempt to fix that ("Metro Cebu ... is comprised of ..."). Giraffedata changed it ("Metro Cebu ... comprises ..."). While I agree that the new wording is correct (in fact, both usages are, as discussed below), I think it re-introduces a possibility of the original misunderstanding.

As Giraffedata has stated here, "It's illogical for a word to mean two opposite things." While it may be illogical, it is, apparently, an unfortunate fact about that word. OxfordDictionaries.com cites both of the following as correct English:

  • (a) the country comprises twenty states
  • (b) the country is comprised of twenty states

Merriam-Webster.com offers these as correct examples as well:

  • (a) The play comprises three acts.
  • (b) Nine players comprise a baseball team.

which correspond respectively to the two Oxford examples -- the two (a)'s having one meaning, while the two (b)'s have the other meaning (Oxford using the passive construct, and Webster using the active, but both reflecting the same meaning). The only usage that Oxford cited as incorrect is this (which nobody has used in the article):

  • (c) the property comprises of bedroom, bathroom, and kitchen

My point is that, considering that there are two different correct meanings of the word "comprise" ((a) and (b)), its usage may introduce some ambiguity. Therefore, in order to avoid all possibility of misinterpretation, I am changing the wording to "consists of" ("Metro Cebu ... consists of ..."). If there is any concern, please discuss here, thanks. -- HLachman (talk) 06:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Metro Cebu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metro Cebu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cross project support invitation

[edit]

Wikivoyage:Metro Cebu is Collaboration of the month this month. Would welcome knowledgable contributions on points of interest in the cities and municipalities of the area. --Traveler100 (talk) 07:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Metro_Cebu&oldid=1203317510"