Jump to content

Talk:Metal-Head

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seriously though...

[edit]

This is just another random Cobra member, which there are a lot of. Objectively, it's had no impact. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:4853:7CAA:3670:F77 (talk) 23:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the sources are: 1) an in-universe list of characters, 2) a primary source, and 3) voice actors, none of which are actually analysis. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:4853:7CAA:3670:F77 (talk) 23:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it doesn't matter as you are now Edit Warring on Metal-Head Untamed1910 (talk) 00:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In particular, Elvisisalive95, you've just breached 3RR and gave no explanation whatsoever, whereas the IP provided a coherent rationale for redirection. Please try to do better. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pppery To me, explaining more than what the warnings themselves that i chose explained, wouldn’t be warranted when you’re dealing with an IP who is blanking an article after zero consensus. I’ve seen a lot of vandals repeatedly blank pages and 9/10 times they get blocked after other users warn/report them which is what i did. I have no personal investment in this article’s subject matter nor do i care what the outcome of the consensus would be. I was simply patrolling recent changes and saw an IP blanking an article. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 21:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The warning you gave says Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Metal-Head, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. The IP surely things they [gave] a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Picture this, you’re patrolling recent changes dealing with IPs engaging in identical behavior, come across another IP blanking a page prior to a consensus. You warn them & they continue to blank the page. Next time i’ll follow your advice and start a dialogue, but typically in that situation i would just Warn and then Report if they continue. I wasn’t coming from a place of bad faith. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus needed prior to redirect

[edit]

There needs to be a consensus before removal of this article & redirect. There are many users which deem this page notable. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 05:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DRNC * Pppery * it has begun... 05:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You reverted my anti-vandalism work because you didn’t agree with it. Even though the user continuously blanked the page after multiple warnings & ultimately got blocked for edit warring. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]