Talk:Men (2022 film)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Men (2022 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 21 May 2022
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to change the word premise to plot as now the entire plot of the film has been written. Moizsg (talk) 05:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Terasail[✉️] 15:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
"Men (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Men (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 12#Men (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 03:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Critical response
[edit]Please remove the criticism from National Review. The author is biased. 2601:645:8200:9800:80D9:4565:F1:3605 (talk) 06:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- I concur. Can we ban sources citing Armond White entirely? He's as much of a movie critic as Elon Musk is a rocket scientist. 71.227.120.53 (talk) 02:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Every Critique is a op-ed. Every Review is an opinion. This is no science. You cannot ban one side of the story just because you don't like what is being said. The guy is more movie critic than you both are. 2001:A61:BC3:C801:1C98:9C55:4FA2:2A59 (talk) 01:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Themes and Analysis
[edit]I saw a request for more input on the themes and analysis for this film, and found a review from Peter Travers of Good Morning America that discussed that, along with praise for Jessie Buckley's performance. I cut and pasted what I feel was a relevant portion of the article to the main for the film. StarconOne (talk) 22:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. It appears you copy and pasted from this site (which is © 2022 ABC News Internet Ventures). Please read WP:COPYPASTE. Mike Allen 05:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class British cinema articles
- British cinema task force articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Stub-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles