Talk:Members Only (fashion brand)

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nickelodeon and Millenials

Article says that in 2016, Members Only collaborated with Nickelodeon to reach Millenials. What? Millenials are in their 30s and probably don't watch much Nick. 165.225.38.81 (talk) 22:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Kelshaw interpretation

Wikipedia "popular culture" sections are rife with poorly referenced examples, but here an example has been cited to a published work of scholarship on popular culture. So please don't remove it. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 01:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a great new article regarding the history of Members Only that came out recently via Mental Floss. I added a sentence regarding their shift in advertisement to the "popular culture" section. Definitely more worth adding in from this source if anyone is interested in taking a closer look at it. Cheers Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro

Members Only Picture

I am constantly amazed at the population that tries to make themselves famous by adding pictures of themselves related to topics. 137.118.161.59 (talk) 11:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]