Talk:Mekhilta of Rabbi Ishmael

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Judaism High‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Mekhilta of Rabbi Ishmael was copied or moved into Mekhilta (disambiguation) with this edit on 12 March 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Needs Major Cleanup

This article appears to have been dumped here, incomplete, without wikification. Needs to be completed and wikified. Dfass 16:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request Edit - CC-BY English Text

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Sefaria has a full English translation of this text, presented in parallel to the original.

It's licensed CC-BY, translated by Shraga Silverstein.

I believe that a link to this would fall under section 2 of WP:ELYES.

I have a COI (I work for Sefaria), and have discussed it on WikiProject:Judaism.

Link should probably be to the Table of Contents for Mekhilta, but could also be to the start of the original text with parallel translation.

LevEliezer (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why not.

Done Altamel (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further examination of the article's history, I see that this edit was previously reverted. I disagree with the revert, and I agree with the requestor that this link is beneficial, as it provides the full text of a work readers would likely be interested in, and does not otherwise promote the organization hosting the text. Altamel (talk) 06:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]