Talk:Mass media in Canada/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Mass media in Canada. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Mass media in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120426005137/http://mmangrum.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/magazine-industry-not-dying-but-evolving/ to http://mmangrum.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/magazine-industry-not-dying-but-evolving/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mass media in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111128052204/http://www.webscopia.com/2011/02/is-television-dying/ to http://www.webscopia.com/2011/02/is-television-dying/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425202910/http://articles.businessinsider.com/2009-06-12/tech/30062877_1_tv-industry-tv-companies-business-models to http://articles.businessinsider.com/2009-06-12/tech/30062877_1_tv-industry-tv-companies-business-models
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Removed broad statement
I removed the following statement: "Canadian journalists are becoming politically active. In November 2018, Unifor, one of two major unions for Canadian journalists, announced that it would campaign against the Conservative Party of Canada in the 43rd Canadian federal election."
This statement was based on a single tweet from Unifor, and it comes from a source I think has some problems. It seems like the union is indeed running some anti-Conservative ads, but what this means is much more subtle than what The Post Millennial is saying. The National Post article presents a more evenhanded discussion. Mind be worth adding some other sort of statement.
Please ping me if there's any disagreement here. Jlevi (talk) 02:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)