Jump to content

Talk:Mass Effect 2: Kasumi – Stolen Memory/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 11:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Initial comments to follow in a few minutes. Thanks for your continued work on Mass Effect topics. -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This looks to be solid and essentially ready for promotion. The prose is clear and concise, the MOS is followed, the referencing is good, spotchecks of the prose and checks of the images showed no copyright issues, the article is neutral and stable. I had only two quibbles that I couldn't immediately fix:

  • " A hologram of Okuda reveals the data, saying that it would impact humanity's reputation if it ever got out." -- this part's a bit unclear to me. What data are we talking about?
The actual data is never revealed in the game. Nevertheless, I clarified it a bit with "confidential and sensitive information".
Thanks, that edit clears it up sufficiently. -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • " in-game asari alien race" -- should Asari be capitalized? Also, "in-game alien race Asari" seems like a slightly more logical word order.
There's a discussion on whether species names should be capitalized or not here, and there's no consensus so far. I agree that "in-game alien race Asari" is a more logical order, so I changed it.
Good with me either way then. -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The infobox image needs a caption--is this logo for the DLC? For the character?
I think it's the logo of the character. I added a caption to clarify it.

Once these are addressed I think this is ready to promote. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the excellent review, much appreciated :) --Niwi3 (talk) 14:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure. This article passes. -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]