Talk:Old Masonic Temple (Marshall, Minnesota)

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Requested move 19 October 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Old Masonic Temple (Marshall, Minnesota). (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 08:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Masonic Temple Delta Lodge No. 119 → Old Masonic temple (Marshall, Minnesota) – Current title is obsolete. Delta Lodge No. 119 has moved to a different location, and its new building (at 204 Mustang Trail in Marshall) is currently the Masonic Temple for Delta Lodge No. 119. I can not find an alternative name for the topic building (it may not have one), but the suggested title is an accurate descriptive title for article... one that avoids any confusion. Blueboar (talk) 16:30, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

I have no input on the idea of moving it, but I would oppose the precise title you suggest: if we move it, we should capitalise "Temple". Nyttend (talk) 20:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If that is appropriate, fine... the reason why I didn't capitalize the word "temple" in my nomination was that I didn't think descriptive titles got capitalized like that. But I am not a style expert, and will defer to those with more knowledge of the rules of capitalization. Blueboar (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.