Talk:Mascarene grey parakeet/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) 14:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

You obviously know the ropes, so just nitpicking on the assumption you'll go to FAC eventually. I made these edits, please check, but note that another editor made several edits before mine.

Yep, I requested a copy edit just in case, so now it's all converging... FunkMonk (talk) 14:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

• ...along with other Mascarene parrots — perhaps ...other parrots from the islands to avoid a third occurrence of Mascarene

Fixed. FunkMonk (talk) 15:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

• Subfossil bones, thought to be of the Mascarene Grey Parakeet, found on Mauritius, — perhaps Subfossil bones, found on Mauritius and thought to be of the Mascarene Grey Parakeet, ,

Fixed. FunkMonk (talk) 15:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

• central one being longest. — are there one or two central feathers. Usually tail feathers are paired

Pluralised. FunkMonk (talk) 15:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

• congeners in other osteological — couple of links maybe?

Fixed. FunkMonk (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

• belonging to the genus Coracopsis by a few authors. — e.g.?

I was thinking of citing those authors, also to give their rationale (parrots of that genus are grey and black, so I guess that's why), but the claims were made in obscure, 19th century French papers, so might be hard to track down... FunkMonk (talk) 14:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

• the "squeeze and whack" tale is told so often in the text and the quotes that I felt I was being beaten round the head too.

Removed one redundant quote, is it enough? FunkMonk (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

I'll have another read through tomorrow Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll fix these issues soon. As for FA, I think it might be a bit on the scrawny side, or what do you think? FunkMonk (talk) 14:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! FunkMonk (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, there's no minimum size for FAC, and in fact my current co-nominated bird FAC starts by saying how little we know about the obscure Polynesian Nauru Reed Warbler. In the end it's your call. Anyway, let's do the deed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: