Jump to content

Talk:Marriage Charter of Empress Theophanu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMarriage Charter of Empress Theophanu has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 9, 2015Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 28, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Marriage Charter of Empress Theophanu gave the Byzantine princess Theophanu joint imperial authority with Holy Roman Emperor Otto II?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Marriage Charter of Empress Theophanu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 21:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    Prose is fine, well-written. No copyvios. I did find a Wikipedia mirror, but nothing where Wikipedia stole from another source.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Follows appropriate layout, within MOS.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    Consistent reference format, citations have enough information.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
    Adequately cited. Offline sources and the French source accepted offline. I'm not fluent yet in German, but I know enough to confirm the two sources which I can access online.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    C. No original research:
    All content is verifiable and attributable to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    All major aspects are dealt with.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
    Stays focused on the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Fair representation, neutral, no bias.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Stable, no edit warring.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    Image is in the public domain.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    An image of the marriage charter is provided, and it is so very beautiful!--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall: Passed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass or Fail: