Talk:Mark Knight

Fair use rationale for Image:Leukduck.jpg

Image:Leukduck.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 15:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Leukduck.jpg

Image:Leukduck.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Leukduck.jpg

Image:Leukduck.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 05:23, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Mark Knight (cartoonist) → Mark Knight – Surprisingly (for what I would have thought was a common name) there is only one Mark Knight with an article here, the other is a redlink with no indication of notability and no context given. Zarcadia (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

• Comment several other "Mark Knight"s have been deleted. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Well if they've been deleted then they don't conform to Wikipedia:Notability. We don't disambiguate on what exists, we disambiguate on what we have articles for. Zarcadia (talk) 17:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Is that true? For example does WP:DAB say that even if a more notable subject exists as a section in a multi-sectioned article then ignore it? In ictu oculi (talk) 02:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

• Comment - depends when the redlink was deleted, I initially thought Mark Knight (musician) the techno DJ wasn't notable, but a Amazon 2CD on Ministry of Sound makes me wonder whether he shouldn't have been deleted after all. es:Mark Knight still exists, not surprisingly as an Ibiza DJ. If the article came back arguing WP:PRIMARY for the cartoonist would be problematic. A low-ranking Ibiza house musician is probably by nature of the web more Googleviewed than even a well known Australian cartoonist. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support. I ain't got a crystal ball; if some article is made about some other guy with this name, let an RM prove primary topic or lack thereof. Red Slash 00:10, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Career

suggest the following in lieu of "Knight and his editor defended the drawing" :

• Knight, and his employer, launched an immediate defence of the cartoon. They argued that it was a depiction of Williams' behaviour and had nothing to do with race. Bought the farm (talk) 14:56, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

References

My mother is not happy,need help with info please

Hi Mark, l don't know, if lm at the right place, but l really don't know,who to contact.l want to go as far to the top as possible,with my complaint.on a lot of paying customers,not getting their Herald Sun delivered,ever since they have stopped newsagency delivering.my elderly mother is one of these. I am in a lot of group's on Australia,on fb & a lot are asking,if they now receive their news paper. My older sister pays for it to be delivered to my 86 year old mother,it doesn't get delivered a lot & she phones them,they keep saying,we will give you credit, but if your not even getting it, how is that fair. How is this fair on elderly,who can't drive no more,who can't walk far or get bus,as it's not close or no shelter from heat or rain or seat, plus crossing a busy main hwy like my mum, that doesn't have crossing lights close.plus shops a long way away. Those that have vertigo & don't have money for a mobile disable scooter. 2405:6E00:2E4E:5100:FD18:EECA:7C90:CB2E (talk) 05:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)