Talk:Jelle's Marble Runs

Jelle's Marble Runs was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 13, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

YouTube Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Photos

Just to clarify, all the photos in this article were given permission for me to use by Dion and Jelle Bakker via Twitter direct messages. Lafayette Baguette ^talk 20:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I explained the OTRS release generator to Jelle and Dion Bakker via Twitter again. He said he would sort it out, so the images for the article should be back up soon. Lafayette Baguette ^talk 14:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Results

Just as in the Lists of Olympic medalists, it would make sense to structure the table by disciplines first (ordered by Summer Marblelympics first, Winter Marblelympics second), followed by an over-all list of the medal results. dracona94 (talk) 20:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:MarbleLympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 22:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 22:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With permission from Nova, who I talked to on Discord, I'll be sharing some comments about the article. I look a quick look at it and I have to say that this will need some work before it can pass. Right now the lead section is very short: Only two sentences, and it doesn't even discuss the rules, history, and other facts. Per the Good Article Criteria, a lead section must be at the very least a summary of the entire article, discussing at the minimum a basic overview of the subject. In addition, the "Teams" and "Results" sections are undersourced, with only a few references. In addition, they don't even go into detail into things like why each team name was chosen, why certain team names were retired, and so forth. There's also relatively little discussion about reception, instead only focusing on YouTube views. If there's not much information about reception that exists then I suppose that's acceptable, but the coverage in the article could be better. Nova will be sharing their thoughts later or tomorrow. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:11, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have to concur with Narutolovehinata5's statement, and I feel like this article is still missing quite a few things, on top of what was described above. For example, the article lack any details of the events (no names, to begin with). An infobox could be appreciated here, but it is a minnow of an issue. Otherwise, if you can fix most of the issues we mentioned in a week, perhaps the review could continue when you're done expanding the article. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:00, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For an update, I'd like to say that I would now agree that a large majority of the article has plenty of inline citations. As for expansion, I'm sure that the lead could be expanded a little more, but I think for now it gives a basic summary of the article. The History section was expanded a little more, with sources. I have also added a section for events. As a side note, it now includes an infobox and image. Lafayette Baguette ^talk 22:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am just going to pop in here and say that this article needs more secondary sources. Right now there are more sources linking directly to the Youtube channel in the article than anything else, and there are large passages which are entirely based on them. Which is a big no-no, see WP:PRIMARY. Everything under Events and below that needs to be re-evaluated right now. Swordman97 ^{talk to me} 05:34, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Lee Vilenski - As much as I like the MarbleLympics, I don't think the article could pass a GA in it's current state. There's a massive {{in universe}} issue contravening Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. The article is written as if the marbles are actually real athletes. It's also an article stat dump, and even fails WP:TRIVIA. As above, there are issues with the article not having enough WP:SECONDARY sources. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I am going to throw in my two cents and stay that their is a lot of links that is to primary sources instead of secondary sources which for an article that is attempting to go for a GA properly will need. Also may why this article even exists as it's properly one of the lowest if not the lowest YT page to have an Wikipedia article. Matt294069 (talk) 11:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lafayette Baguette: Is it possible to add more sources for the prose outside of the YouTube channel itself? Nova Crystallis (Talk) 02:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nova Crystallis: I just took a quick search and I think finding secondary sources will be a challenge as it hasn't really gotten much more detailed coverage other than what's already in the article. Personally the stats table and teams stuff could be enough to fail this GA, and the more I think about it, the more skeptical I am that the issues can be resolved anytime soon. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:01, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the issues pointed by editors above, and the lack of response from the nominator, I will fail this article under criteria 1b and 3b. This does not mean you can't renominate this article, but it'll need quite some work before it has a chance to pass. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 02:41, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:INUNIVERSE

This article suffers quite badly from MOS:INUNIVERSE. The article is written as if the marbles themselves are people. Particularly the MarbleLympics#Notable incidents is really bad for this. The article needs a radical change for this to be suitible.

I'd also suggest a move for the title name, from the current title to Jelle's Marble Runs, as that is the suitible name for what is actually covered here. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not too familiar with this part of the MOS, but is there much of a difference here between the notable incidents section and a plot summary? - Sdkb (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, plot sections are written clearly as being plot, rather than real world incidents Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong reference given for account deletion

The reference cited for the original account getting deleted does not mention this incident, and is from a point in time prior to that alleged incident — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.129.65.42 (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) – Ammarpad (talk) 07:40, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MarbleLympics → Jelle's Marble Runs – The only thing actually notable here is the channel that the events are hosted. See above text. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support broadening the scope of the article per nom. Iffy★Chat -- 08:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. bd2412 T 16:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Contradicting years between sentences

The year named in this second sentence contradicts the one in the former sentence, and I'm not sure which part is true and what was meant to be written: "on which he started the MarbleLympics in 2016 as a mock version of the Olympic games. The series soon started gaining attention and a fanbase in 2015." 607 (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KenLimePie vs jelle controversy

This needs to be addressed as i have been in the middle of this controversy and lately jelle claimed ken. A 2000 subs youtuber got claimed by a 600K youtuber... this will be unfair for both of them — Preceding unsigned comment added by LokiBlaster (talk • contribs) 19:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly...why does it matter to the article about JELLE'S MARBLE RUNS? Secondly, there is no factual basis for any comparison or controversy or unfairness, so there is no foundation for your OPINION. Thridly, they aren't the same. Jelle runs real marbles on real tracks built by him, obviously putting in more work than Ken anyway. Ken just runs a cheap simulation.

There is no controversy.

--Jelroy the second (talk) 21:56, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When updating YouTube data

I am a primary updater of the data retrieved from the About page of the channel. If you would like to update it (maybe you haven't seen me update it in a while) keep in mind that three things should be updated. First, the subscribers and views sections of the infobox, along with the date (use the exact current format) Second, update the article summary (the first paragraph). It includes the approximate number of subscribers (again, maintain the format). Thirdly, update the retrieval date of the data (on the article summary) to the current date (maintain format).

--Jelroy the second (talk) 22:07, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Marble League Results

It was in the final round of the final event of the 2016 Marble League, that it came down to the top 4 finishers of the entire league. The Thunderbolts with 36 points, along with Savage Speeders, Mellow Yellow, and Team Momo all tied at 34. Team Momo finished in 4th. The Thunderbolts failed to capture gold and finished in 3rd. And it was a very close finish between Mellow Yellow and Savage Speeders. But Speedy beat out Yellup by a hundredth of a second to become winners of the first Marble League season. What a way to end the first season with a very close finish.

Hornean (talk) 14:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should be added! And also the other marble leagues. Tulurm (talk) 07:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

Just wondering about the marble team flags that have been added recently. What is the source for them? Nothing about them on the YouTube and was considering expanding them throughout the page but want peoples opinion on this

KingOfBees (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)KingOfBees[reply]

In regards of the detailed tables and flags

I don't think it is relevant to include all the detailed results and have detailed tables for the events on this channel. That kind of stuff belongs more on a fan wiki (there is one for Jelle's Marble Runs). And about the flags, there are no connections to these teams being related to countries and no sources that say that they are.

Pax de tweede (talk) 17:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree... I think this article will always have issues with "fancruft" which we should guard against. ~EdGl talk 18:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We've still been having issues with Wikipedia:Too much detail... we don't need any more tables and charts in this article, especially when dealing with fictional sporting events. ~EdGl talk 00:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it has been stated on several occasions by Jelle’s staff that the marbles in question are not based in real countries, rather fictional ones. --TheAlmightyOctopodeOfRandomness (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why we have tables of "results" at all. This isn't a sporting endeavour, it's very crufty. See my comments above #MOS:INUNIVERSE. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teams

I request that a list of the teams in JMR should be added. Tulurm (talk) 07:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also, expand this article. It should be expanded as it is, in my opinion, not very good.

It could definitely benefit from expansion. Tulurm (talk) 07:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]