Jump to content

Talk:Titular Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur v Menteri Dalam Negeri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Malaysia v. The Herald)

Verb tense

[edit]

Much of the artilce was written in present tense and read like it was cut and pasted from news articles. The whole artilce probably should be rewritten and consolidated.Wkharrisjr (talk) 15:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Herald or The Catholic Herald?

[edit]

What is the proper name of the newspaper? And do newspaper names get italisized, placed in quotation marks, left unhighlighted?Wkharrisjr (talk) 15:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be italicized, per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(titles)#Italics. --BorgQueen (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Proper name of the paper newsletter is "Herald The Catholic Weekly" and the website is called "Herald Malaysia Online". Probably should move the page since I don't think the article title is an official name for a court case. I have used Herald throughout the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:26, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's great but Allah needs to be italicized, per WP:MOS#Italics. I reverted your change; please edit the article again without removing the italics. --BorgQueen (talk) 04:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yahweh and Allah

[edit]

If the link to Yahweh and Allah is removed without a good reason, then I will re-insert it.--478jjjz (talk) 11:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/48678-allah-word-court-grants-stay and seven other sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Mkativerata (talk) 20:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Titular Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur?

[edit]

Why “titular”? Kuala Lumpur is not a titular see, is it? – Kaihsu (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's the title under which the case is reported in the Malayan Law Journal. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 12:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but why the word “titular”? Is this related to the lack of recognition by the Malaysian state? – Kaihsu (talk) 12:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was the church that initiated the suit, it would have been the party that chose the name "Titular Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur" to set out in the court documents. So it's unlikely that the Malaysian Government had anything to do with the choice of the name. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 15:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic Bishops (Incorporation) Act 1957 (Revised 1992) – Kaihsu (talk) 10:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Malaysia court rules non-Muslims cannot use 'Allah' 2013-10-14

[edit]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24516181 "A Malaysian court has ruled that non-Muslims cannot use the word Allah to refer to God, even in their own faiths, overturning a 2009 lower court ruling. The appeals court said the term Allah must be exclusive to Islam or it could cause public disorder." – Kaihsu (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Federal court judgment

[edit]

http://www.cljlaw.com/default.asp?page=cotw140718&scrollto=COTW1 http://www.webcitation.org/6UzQquvaQ TITULAR ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF KUALA LUMPUR v. MENTERI DALAM NEGERI & ORS FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA ARIFIN ZAKARIA CJ, RAUS SHARIF PCA, ZULKEFLI MAKINUDIN CJ (MALAYA), RICHARD MALANJUM CJ (SABAH & SARAWAK), SURIYADI HALIM OMAR FCJ, ZAINUN ALI FCJ, JEFFREY TAN FCJ [CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 08-690-11-2013] 23 JUNE 2014 [2013] CLJ JT(6).

The text of the majority judgment (October 2014) is archived here: http://www.catholiclawyersmalaysia.org/sites/default/files/Federal%20Court%20Judgement%20In%20The%20Herald%20Case.pdf http://www.webcitation.org/6UzRJ7gLJ http://www.heraldmalaysia.com/images/file/MAJORITY-JUDGMENT_CJ,PCA,CJM,SURIYADI-HALIM-OMAR-FCJ.pdf http://www.webcitation.org/6UzRJaXEP

It seems that the case is still being appealed, the hearing set for 21 January 2015: http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2014/11/17/Fed-Court-Church-judicial-review-application/ http://www.webcitation.org/6UzSIJq8M and there are wider implications http://www.webcitation.org/6UzS85lF3 – Kaihsu (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

“The Herald, the Catholic Church's weekly newsletter, has exhausted all legal avenues to use the word "Allah" to refer to God in its publication after the Federal Court denied its application for leave to appeal the Court's earlier decision on Wednesday.” Wednesday, 21 January 2015. End of the road for the Herald's 'Allah' appeal

“The Allah controversy lives on after the Roman Catholic Church failed in its legal challenge for the right to use the word “Allah” in the Bahasa Malaysia section of its weekly newsletter, The Herald.” 29 Jan 2015. Malaysia – Allah Controversy Resurfaced In Jill Ireland’s Case

--Kaihsu (talk) 19:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Titular Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur v Menteri Dalam Negeri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2023 government reaction

[edit]

Malaysia to streamline rules on non-Muslims using the word ‘Allah’: PM Anwar Kaihsu (talk) 10:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Titular_Roman_Catholic_Archbishop_of_Kuala_Lumpur_v_Menteri_Dalam_Negeri&oldid=1219538257"