Talk:Major prophet

Bible High‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity High‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism High‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:TITLE

Something odd here. Does "Isaiah is a major prophet" sound like a WP:RS phrase? It would be "Isaiah is one of the major prophets" plural. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Change the article's title

Should the article's title be changed to "Major prophets"? Discuss. Editor2020, Talk 02:58, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

THEN WHY MENTION THE JEWS?

"The major prophets is a grouping of books in the Christian Old Testament that does not occur in the Hebrew Bible." Well if "the major prophets" are defined by the fact that they aren't included in the "Jewish Bible" (which I believe is a manufactured term, and for political purposes), then why does the Article insist on including "the Jewish Bible" in the body of the Article at all, as if that "bible" is somehow relevant to this Article? The Lede just SAID they aren't included, and yet it keeps banging on the drum of this non-existent Jewish "bible". It's like a pushy salesperson trying to sell you the thing you DON'T want, after you put specific effort to come into the store looking for that thing, and nothing else. If I want to learn about "the Jewish Bible", I'll go to THAT Wikipedia Article, no... wait... that "Article" doesn't exist. So then why is Wikipedia polluting my awareness with this garbage?

2603:8081:3A00:30DF:FD3C:8F61:AB5B:1BA (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]