Talk:M. S. Golwalkar

M. S. Golwalkar was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 6, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the M. S. Golwalkar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: Maharashtra / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Bunch of Thoughts and We, or Our Nationhood Defined

The lead section clearly states these two books were authored by M. S. Golwalkar. But following the recent controversy in Kerala regarding naming an institute after Golwalkar, the state RSS leaders have rejected certain contents of these books and has come up with a claim that both these books were not original works of Golwalkar. Bunch of Thoughts is a compilation of his speeches and thoughts made by a Rao and We, or Our Nationhood Defined is an independent translation of a Marathi work. I guess the lead sentence should be changed, including these details. 2001:7C0:205F:8001:0:0:0:173 (talk) 11:43, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"We, or Our National Defined" not an independent translation of Marathi work, Rashtramimansa. A comparison of the works shows the differences. It was not until 1963 that Golwalkar started to distance himself from "We, or Our National Defined" ^[1]. Wecacuee (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Jha, Devendra K (31 July 2021). "Guruji's Lie The RSS and MS Golwalkar's undeniable links to Nazism". No. August 2021. The Caravan. The Caravan. Retrieved 1 January 2022. After I went through Rashtramimansa, I found that all the critical formulations mentioned in We belonged solely to Golwalkar—especially its project of promoting a Hindu culture along the lines of Nazi antisemitism and its prescription of total assimilation or ethnic cleansing to deal with the problem of minorities in India.

Confused introduction

A couple of months ago, the 5th sentence of the lede read

He was the first person to put forward the concept of a religion-based nation called "Hindu Rashtra" which is believed to have evolved into the concept of the "two nation theory", separate nations for Hindus and Muslims.

After various gradual changes, partially reverted, the sentence now reads

He was not the first person to put forward the concept of a cultural nation called "Hindu Rashtra" which is believed to have evolved into the concept of the "akhand bharat theory", united nations for Bharatiyas.

I don't know the topic well enough to say off-hand whether any, all, or none of the changes is correct, and it's not really covered in the article body either. My gut feeling is that, at least, the "not" shouldn't be there – that's what made me start looking at the article history in the first place – and even if that is factually correct it does need to be rephrase because this only looks odd. --bonadea contributions talk 11:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[gurujis-lie-1] Jha, Devendra K (31 July 2021). "Guruji's Lie The RSS and MS Golwalkar's undeniable links to Nazism". No. August 2021. The Caravan. The Caravan. Retrieved 1 January 2022. After I went through Rashtramimansa, I found that all the critical formulations mentioned in We belonged solely to Golwalkar—especially its project of promoting a Hindu culture along the lines of Nazi antisemitism and its prescription of total assimilation or ethnic cleansing to deal with the problem of minorities in India.

[1]