Talk:MICROSCOPE

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 4 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 14:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MICROSCOPE (satellite) → MICROSCOPE – no disambiguation needed. Can't move myself as the target is on the title blacklist. mfb (talk) 09:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mfb and Randy Kryn: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This would be controversial, per microscope. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - the title is too ambiguous with Microscope. Interstellarity (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per WP:DIFFCAPS, particularly the MAVEN example, which is exactly analogous to this one._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Capitalisation is enough to differentiate. JIP | Talk 11:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per ZXCVBNM, how could this be controversial, the difference is very distinct so why would someone use ALL CAPS to search for a generic term? Note that there is also MicroScope that is far more subtle but still probably passed DIFFCAPS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.