Jump to content

Talk:Moscow Exchange

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:MICEX-RTS)

Name of the Merged Stock Exchange

[edit]

I changed the name in the infobox from "Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange" (one of the two merged stock exchanges) to "MICEX-RTS". Since the abbreviated forms of companies' names often become official names (especially for mergers like this) and since the article does not state that the official name of the stock exchange is "Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange-Russian Trading System" I did not put that as the name. If someone has other information, by all means add it and change the name (I would guess that the exchange will be changing its name to something entirely different in the near future). Lexicon (talk) 18:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And the article actually says there will be a rebranding. Lexicon (talk) 18:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing 4th paragraph

[edit]

The 4th paragraph currently says (sans refs):

The full merger of the organisational structure is not yet completed. Problems in merging the infrastructure resulted in computer error in trades, something that had not happened on the merged exchanges for a decade: on the first day of trades, there was a short period of computer glitches when the clearing system malfunctioned, which resulted in registering multiple unsanctioned deals, with some traders suffering losses.

The section in question is in bold. The exchanges just merged this month, but this makes it sound like they have been merged for at least a decade. Is it ment to say "had not happened on either exchange for a decade."? Richard-of-Earth (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Moscow Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russian stocks crash 33% and ruble plunges to record low

[edit]

Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/24/investing/ruble-russian-stocks-crash/index.html

”was the largest exchange in Russia”?

[edit]

The article has a confusing twist re. this, incl. indications that the exchange might not even reopen - ever. Not knowing the background re. this, although being quite convinced that the exchange will continue to exist and - at some point - will resume trading, I tried to insert some more details re. the current suspension and the - announced - gradual reopening in the coming week. One thing that is clear, is that they are in a mess. However also a mess can be described correctly, I believe. I would really appreciate if someone could review what I’ve done plus, ideally, help bring some more clarity to the subject: I don’t like the ”was” in the beginning, and also, I have put the mention of the trade suspension in the intro more to contrast that ”was” than seeing it as a valid part of an intro. And then the suspension was also, albeit incorrectly, referenced under History. There I at least put it under a separate headline, but since it is happening right now, it can’t be history yet, imho? A new headline for this, perhaps? Any ideas? Gunboz (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think if it ever reopens it would be correct to change "was" to "is", but that feels too much like a prediction to me.
A stock exchange which has indefinitely ceased exchanging stocks is, by definition, a former exchange, not wikipedia's job to predict what may happen. worse case scenario wikipedia was technically accurate but not prescient for a few weeks/months/years. I can live with that. Shabbydabbydoowah (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ok, true. Thanks! Gunboz (talk) 13:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Now, although, that first „was“ has been changed to „is“, the „operated“ in the second sentence still remains. Any clues or insights? Mistake or intention? Gunboz (talk) 02:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Moscow Exchange

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Moscow Exchange's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto2":

  • From South Korea: "Population by Census (2016)". Korean Statistical Information Service. Archived from the original on 28 February 2018. Retrieved 11 March 2018.
  • From Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia: "Putin raises tax for wealthy Russians ahead of vote on his rule". Reuters. 23 June 2020.
  • From Netherlands: "Oppervlakte".
  • From Brazil: "Quantas usinas geradoras de energia temos no Brasil?". CBIE. 5 April 2019.
  • From National Settlement Depository (Russia): Stafford, Philip; Stubbington, Tommy; Smith, Robert (28 March 2022). "Banks stuck in legal tangle over Russian corporate bond payments".
  • From Taiwan: "Fears over over-education in Taiwan". The Australian. 3 September 2012.
  • From Norilsk Nickel: "Arctic's Biggest Air Polluter Nornickel Shuts Down Smelter at Infamous Factory". The Moscow Times. 2019-11-19. Retrieved 2021-09-16.
  • From Portugal: "Censos 2021 - Divulgação dos Resultados Provisórios". Statistics Portugal - Web Portal. 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why Moscow Exchange is owned by Public Company ?

[edit]

Public company ?? 1.186.125.7 (talk) 04:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Moscow_Exchange&oldid=1218029047"