Talk:Lynn Goldsmith

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled

This was my first entry in wiki and once I read the guidelines, I changed a good deal of it to comply with your rules and I believe it should remain online. Should I add more references to where some of the information has come from. The page no longer follows her bio on her website or from Lexar, but information was gathered from there. Laurenbullard 23:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After comparing it with the website it was allegedly taken from, I agree & have removed the {{db-copyvio}} warning. It still needs sourcing & referencing, though. — iridescent (talk to me!) 23:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I'm aware that this is still being worked on, so won't tag it (yet) but it urgently needs reliable sources. — iridescent (talk to me!) 18:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable statement

The statement offering that Ms. Goldsmith's work is "staggering" seems a bit out of line. I don't remember the official terminology Wikipedia uses for this, but the statement seems like fan talk instead of an encyclopedic observation. It's more in the way it's worded as opposed to actual fact as she has had a varied and interesting career. Thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 15:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lynn Goldsmith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Warhol Foundation litigation

I removed the phrase, "effectively terminating Warhol's copyright in the images" because that is patently inaccurate. The Court's ruling applies only to the specific use at issue—i.e., licensing the image to a magazine. The litigation does not resolve whether Warhol himself made a fair use, and the concurrence reinforced that had the litigation surrounded, e.g., exhibition of "Orange Prince" in a gallery the outcome might have been different. (apologies for not signing in)