Talk:Lymphadenectomy

Medicine: Hematology-oncology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Lymphadenectomy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Ambiguity

This second line "It is almost always performed as part of the surgical management of cancer" I found ambiguous because it could mean that it is almost always performed whenever someone has surgery for cancer or that when it is performed it is almost always as part of the surgical management of cancer.

Lieroll (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Futility

I'm not so sure about, "When the sentinel node is free of tumor cells, this is highly predictive of freedom from metastasis in the entire lymphatic basin, thus leading to futility of a full node dissection." The last phrase, "...futility of a full node dissection" doesn't seem to have the correct implication. Futility implies a task whose end result is unattainable, i.e. it is futile to reach a 7 foot shelf when you are 5 feet tall. I'm not a medical person, but it seems more appropriate to say, "When the sentinel node is free of tumor cells, this is highly predictive of freedom from metastasis in the entire lymphatic basin, thus leading to contraindication of a full node dissection." That is, full node dissection is not medically indicated in the situation. Chriskalexander (talk) 18:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it to "thus allowing a full node dissection to be avoided". - Rod57 (talk) 12:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Complete/radical/formal LND

Medical abbreviations:C pipes complete lymph node dissection here but 'complete' is not mentioned, and not clear if it is the same as radical lymph node dissection. Possibly the same as 'full node dissection'? What is a 'formal node dissection' ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History section would be useful

A history section could describe: when started, practices before sentinel node mapping, and recent developments. - Rod57 (talk) 11:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May not be helpful for advanced ovarian cancer

[1] described a randomised clinical trial that showed no benefit from systematic lymphadenectomy for advanced ovarian cancer. Could mention (if find other sources - maybe for other cancers ?) ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]