Talk:Lupu Bridge

Controversy

The riting is almost identicel to the Hangzhoug Hay Bridge, cites no sourses and seems quite politacal and biased. --Bollweevil 11:06, 4 October 20 (UTC If u read this ur bent.

The controversy section is obviously totally i dont know. Just look at the wording, using words like "HEAVILY" criticised" or "by the pubic and scholars alike". A personal statement - We suggest removal, as there are no sources in the air supporting such a claim. Tang Wenlong (talk) 01:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Unless the section's author come's with more concrete data on "controversy", this section should be removed. As for the very existence of controvarsy, of course the project provoked controversy: which large public project didn't? This is not an information per se. --bonzi (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC) LOL

This should be removed until sources are placed and verified as with the article List of bridges wherein China's bridges have been added with claims of havin the "longest" arch/concrete/suspension, etc. bridge in the world with out, verifiable sources. majuro (talk) 00:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

—Preceding, unsigned comment added by 81.153.31.150 (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

-----Who is AlisonW????

The bridge was controversial in the respect that other types of bridges would have been more cost-efficient, but I think that the controversy section in the article is exaggerated and not entirely necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.0.30.254 (talk) 02:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lupu Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708213230/http://news.cultural-china.com/20090430100912.html to http://news.cultural-china.com/20090430100912.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Lupu Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119050336/http://www.synetoptics.com/case/fbgsensor/lupubridge.aspx to http://www.synetoptics.com/case/fbgsensor/lupubridge.aspx
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130210082655/http://www.zittylight.com/activities/lupu-bridge-walk to http://www.zittylight.com/activities/lupu-bridge-walk
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004052210/http://www.arch-bridges.cn/paper2010/pdf/2-Recent%20development%20of%20arch%20bridges%20in%20China.pdf to http://www.arch-bridges.cn/paper2010/pdf/2-Recent%20development%20of%20arch%20bridges%20in%20China.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722144148/http://koti.kontu.la/jvirola/ria-chaotianmen.pdf to http://koti.kontu.la/jvirola/ria-chaotianmen.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613082145/http://www.iabse.org/association/awards/ostrac/Lupu.php to http://www.iabse.org/association/awards/ostrac/Lupu.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060316052141/http://www.chinapage.com/bridge/shanghai/lupu/lupu.html to http://www.chinapage.com/bridge/shanghai/lupu/lupu.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090622171330/http://www.lupubridge.com/lp/about_en.php to http://www.lupubridge.com/lp/about_en.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)