Talk:Lupeni strike of 1929

A fact from Lupeni strike of 1929 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Lupeni Strike of 1929 in Romania was originally blamed on Hungarian propagandists and Comintern activists?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/March.

Wikipedia

Organized Labour Mid‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Article Of The Day for August 5.

I have nominated the article for WP:DYK please check the question Alex Bakharev 11:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article contradicts itself
First, it says that "communist agitators had an important role in radicalising the miners.", but then it says "the communists' overall role had been small"
It contains orignal research:
"As these actions had an air of sabotage, it appears very likely that communist agitators had an important role in radicalising the miners."
unattributed claims:
"communist agitators were active in the spring of 1929 in the Jiu Valley"
"in order to prevent the mines from being flooded and those underground from being asphyxiated"
And weasel words:
"it appears","According to later testimony,"

Anonimu 23:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lupeni strike of 1929. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]