Talk:Lu Over the Wall
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Critical Response
[edit]User:The sleepwalker I reverted your edit deleting the review from RogerEbert.com. It seems to fit the guidelines on Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film#Critical response. If you'd like to further discuss that, please do so here. Ehler (talk) 03:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Why? The sleepwalker (talk) 04:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
You’re also a Missouri-synod Lutheran. Well, his comment in summary says he was bored. It’s a childish exaggeration and it’s not helpful to discerning whether the movie is worth watching or not. Therefore, it doesn’t add anything to the article. The sleepwalker (talk) 04:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- It seems to me that it's criticizing several things at once; the quality of the voice acting and narrative structure, in addition to the themes. User:Blue Oceanman originally contributed the review, maybe he or she could provide some clarity as to why the source was originally chosen. There's not a lot of clear guidance from policies on what reviews to include, but I think WP:Balance might lend itself towards the merits of having a critical review. Ehler (talk) 22:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class anime and manga articles
- Low-importance anime and manga articles
- All WikiProject Anime and manga pages
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class Japanese cinema articles
- Japanese cinema task force articles
- Start-Class Animated films articles
- Low-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles