Jump to content

Talk:Love in Motion (Anika Moa album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Love In Motion)
Good articleLove in Motion (Anika Moa album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 25, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
May 15, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
June 28, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
September 18, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
December 1, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Love in Motion (Anika Moa album)/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --CallMeNathanTalk2Me 23:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • The album's underlying theme is one of love, and in writing the album, Moa drew the most inspiration from her civil partner, Azaria Universe. -> could read better.
  • Better?
  • I know your from New Zealand, but the dates are backwards.
  • MOS:DATE - either style is acceptable. Since this is about a NZ-origin album, I have used NZ English
  • Love in Motion saw Moa -> can albums see?
  • Lol, done
  • Critical reviews for the album have been mostly positive, and it debuted and peaked on the New Zealand Albums Chart at number four -> doesn't flow. Consider splitting
  • Done
  • The lead single from Love in Motion was "Running Through the Fire (Storm)", -> "RTFS" served as the album's lead single, which peaked
  • Done

Background

[edit]
  • shouldn't it be Background and inspiration? You speak about the song's lyrical inspiration, not so much the recording process
  • Inspiration is part of an album's background
  • the album.[2][3] The album -> try to mix it up a bit
  • Done
  • "In the Air" is about Moa's fear of flying. -> sentencing is a bit awkward. Could be fixed up a bit. Many sentences don't flow and are so short, it reads choppy
  • Hmm, take a look now?
  • and the album was recorded in two more weeks -> with the entire recording process being completed in one month; or something like that
  • That would kind of blur what the source is saying.
  • and the album was produced by Moa and Andre Upston -> doesn't flow with the beginning of the sentence
  • Done

Music and lyrics

[edit]
  • should be music and composition, as this section doesn't speak much of the lyrics, as the previous section does
Renamed as 'Composition'
  • Love in Motion saw -> doesn't make sense
  • Done
  • pop rock environment -> environment
  • Eh?
  • The sound of -> the sound? or the song?
  • Rewrote sentence
  • ". -> you have allot these issues
  • I don't understand. Do you mean I have too many quotes?
  • Katarina Filipe praised Moa's live performing nature, noting that "the radio and CD versions were nothing compared to her on-stage performance" -> is this a good thing?
  • Yes, the recorded versions were nothing (ie bad) compared to her live performances (ie really good)

Singles

[edit]
  • It has not appeared on any singles chart, however. -> it didn't; also try combining it with another sentence.

Charts

[edit]
  • You should create a peaking chart as well as certifications wherever applicable.
  • Why? It has only appeared on one chart.

References

[edit]
  • Would be better is dates were year-month-day format, like this 2010-11-30.
  • Date stylings are optional, and I have noticed that ISO dates are becoming less common on WP