Talk:Lost Ship of the Desert

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I have (generously? and/or foolishly?) posted this LOST SHIP OF THE DESERT page from notes given me by a coorespondent. I have not checked all the links. I do not have great experience with Wikipedia formatting, so any help and corrections will be greatly appreciated. RioRico 23:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ric thanks for starting this I have been updating when I can Anne Isayhello2u 20:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Some stories say there may be more than one ship in the desert. others that there are none at all. Some of the stories are tall tales. Some of the stories are true. And some of the stories have yet to be told." -- tone? That whole paragraph does not sound like an Encyclopedia, especially the last sentence.

I'm hiding that whole list of references for right now. It looks helpful, but there's way too much, and I don't have time to pick out the most relevant ones. There are a lot of instances where the article says something like "people said" or "it is claimed"; these would be good spots to cite the reference list. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 03:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC

kerowyn missed the point it was not a reference list it was a timeline of written versions of the stories showing the evolution and changes to the legend over a period of close to 200 yrs the legend is part oral tradition. if the story was little red riding hood would she expect a quote from the wolf? sadly my computer skills are poor i cannot retrieve the information she removed.

What's the deal with the long "media renditions" section? I totally don't understand it, but it feels wrong to remove a third of the article when I don't even understand the purpose of it ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.251.135.45 (talk) 18:11, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A more recent media item is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oS04wzlPNxs .