Talk:Lockheed CL-1200 Lancer

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Wow, bad name

Considering the X-27 never actually existed, I can see no reason to include it in the title here. It's confusing and reads poorly. Since X-27 already redirs here (or tries to), it seems there's more than enough ways to find this article either way. Maury 16:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but it's an X-plane designation none the less, and I was trying to account for that. I was trying to take to existing stubs, and make a better page. THe title was a sticcky point tho, and I'm not totally satisified with it either. If there's a consensus to move it to CL-1200 Lancer (by an admin, as page already exists), I won't oppose it. - BillCJ 16:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy with either Lockheed CL-1200 or CL-1200 Lancer personally. Maury 16:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Lockheed CL-1200. - BillCJ 17:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Saved me the effort :-) Maury 18:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More reference material

I have a four page article from a 1972 book which gives very detailed information on the CL1200 proposal, I can add some if you are happy, cheers. Nimbus227 21:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do, book references are IMHO better than WebLinks. --Colputt 23:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do when I find the time, cheers Nimbus227 11:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some progress

Have added an infobox and my reference which confirms the specifications so removed the 'aerospecs' tag. There is a fair chunk on costings in my book which I might summarise. Lots of emphasis on commonality with the F-104 as well as a sales pitch, need to paragraph that. The image has come out a bit large in the infobox and the resolution is not so good, if someone could make it a bit smaller please (until I work ut how to do it myself!), Cheers Nimbus227 19:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]