Talk:LoDaisKa site

A fact from LoDaisKa site appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the LoDaisKa Site in Colorado was occupied for 7,500 years, starting in the Paleo-Indian period?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/February.

Wikipedia

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Removal of "over a 7,500 year period"

The source for the following was a very short blurb describing the site:

Archaeological evidence shows that the LoDaiKa site was inhabited over a 7,500 year period,^[1]

The detailed archaeological information provided so far routinely places occupation of the site over a 4,000 year history (3000 BC to AD 1000), an outlier being a projectile point and flakes - but there is not consensus about whether that is Paleo-Indian or Archaic - nor actual dating of the item.

So, that's why I took this out, but it may be that there's information I'm not aware of so far. Is there a specific reference that provides dates of occupation outside of the 3000 BC and AD 1000 window? Thanks!!!-CaroleHenson (talk) 19:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to the source, produced by the State Historic Preservation Office, there's Paleoindian material at the site from this date. Nyttend (talk) 21:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response! Yep, I saw that the one cited source gave a sweeping statement about the land being inhabited for over 7,500 years. Unfortunately, the information from archaeological excavations "routinely places occupation of the site over a 4,000 year history (3000 BC to AD 1000)". Do you know of something more detailed that identifies sites that spanned more than 7,500 years? (I couldn't find any and I looked pretty hard - but of course, could have missed something.)--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:31, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see part of the issue is the use of the term "inhabited" which is what I'm going by. The other is about the "Archaic" projectile point - which could bear a lot more conversation if you're interested.--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:39, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LoDaisKa Site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120424231006/https://portfolio.du.edu/portfolio/getportfoliofile?uid=150209 to https://portfolio.du.edu/portfolio/getportfoliofile?uid=150209

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^ Cite error: The named reference coahp was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[coahp-1] Cite error: The named reference coahp was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]