Talk:Living Machine

Neutrality

This article glorifes John Todd unecessarily. It also vilifies Taos unecessarily. Is the current situation unfair? Yes. Is John Todd brilliant? I think so, but these are value judgements not fit for an objective and neutral reference work. This article needs to be cleaned up to be inline with policy.—WAvegetarian•(talk) 22:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How does this "villify" Taos. Taos is mentioned ONCE, and just in reference to owning a trademark. Also, I don't see where this is glorifying Todd. Yes, it cites him, and his studies, work, etc, but that is because he is the one who came up with his and did a large part of the early research. This article is totally in line with policy.--Dbpatt 19:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Dbpatt[reply]

Sorry, Dbpatt, I basically rewrote the whole article, and just deleted almost everything that was previously there, but forgot to get rid of the neutrality notice. Thanks! More editing still to come!Yodelheck 06:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It still needs some clean up in terms of neutrality and perhaps, more importantly, intellectual honesty. For example, processing 40 litres a day may pretty darned impressive but it is less than 9 gallons. Hardly something to get excited about. This article needs more balance because, believe it or not, there are reasons "living machines" are not used on a large scale at this time. D.Downer ( 4-4-2007)

New and improved article

This is a wonderfully indepth description of a living machine. I personally am amazed at the content, I was able to understand the highly technical jargon which is generally not a writting style I prefer. I did not pick up on any strong neutrality issues, they seem to have been reworked out of the original article. Job well done.lichen-studios 08:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC)lichen-studios[reply]

So this is something that is already being done! I think this is another solution for a mess that needs multi-pronged approach. Thank you for the info. UrbanRez 04:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Living machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080616095630/http://www.humboldt.edu/~ere_dept/marsh/ to http://www.humboldt.edu/~ere_dept/marsh/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Living machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070210005606/http://www.ecovillagefindhorn.com/biological/index.php to http://www.ecovillagefindhorn.com/biological/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Living machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]