Talk:List of winners of the EFL Championship and predecessors

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: England Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Title wins by County

I have just corrected a couple of sample errors in this section but there are several more which need picking up Grimsby Town F.Cand Middlesbrough F.C. are just two and I would have done so if I had not started to question what the value of this section really is. I am not aware of anywhere else and in any other context that we take much heed of which county teams collectively reside. All the list goes to show is how the majority of clubs and the clubs with the most clout tend to be historically associated with the larger conurbations. If the consensus is that this list page is of value then its also worth pointing out apart from the errors, that the choice of Counties ( which were labelled cities until I edited the title just now ) are a mix bag and need some overhaul. A visit to Counties of England will reveal that they are a mixture of historic, ceremonial, defunct and current titles and along with London are in need of a rethink. Tmol42 (talk) 21:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some further alterations to this article pretty much in line with the above, such as taking Grimsby out of Yorkshire and moving Stoke to Staffordshire as well as including Millwall in the list as they would appear to have been left out- perhaps nobody likes them after all ;) Hopefully this will make the table a little more accurate- at least the figures add up now and correspond with the list directly above it. I didn't go so far as to check thoroughly against the roll of winners though, so there may be some discrepancies there. Similarly I have used the counties that had already been used (with the exception of Staffordshire which I added) and haven't, for example, broken Yorkshire down into its constituent administrative parts. I agree that there's not much use for this part, however large numbers of other articles contain similarly irrelevant sections so I am somewhat loath to remove it. IrishPete (talk) 15:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had no qualms about removing it:

It is trivial and of little real interest.
Unlike cricket, football has little to do with counties (other than the county F.A.s).
It is too complex to measure and would be not be meaningful. West Bromwich Albion won their 2nd-flight titles when the club was based in Staffordshire, but they are now based in the West Midlands (the club hasn't moved but the boundaries have). Similarly, Birmingham used to be in Warwickshire and Bradford is now in West Yorkshire, not Yorkshire. There are many more similar examples. This section had to go. --Jameboy (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of teams promoted from the English Football League Championship and predecessors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060823092952/http://www.football-league.premiumtv.co.uk/page/PastWinners/0%2C%2C10794%2C00.html to http://www.football-league.premiumtv.co.uk/page/PastWinners/0%2C%2C10794%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Play-offs

The way that the tables are laid out makes it seem as though the play-offs were introduced in 1992-93 rather than 1986-87. However, I'm not sure what would be the best way to make it clearer. --Jameboy (talk) 14:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]