Talk:List of surface features of Mars visited by Spirit and Opportunity

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Mars / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mars task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as High-importance).

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

There is a clear consensus to merge the two articles. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of surface features of Mars imaged by Spirit and List of surface features of Mars imaged by Opportunity → List of surface features of Mars visited by Spirit and Opportunity – it would probably make more sense to have these two otherwise short articles consolidated into one, and renamed "visited by" rather than "imaged by", as the purpose of these missions obviously weren't to just take pictures of things. WikiProject Astronomy and WikiProject Spaceflight have been notified of this discussion through their respective talk pages. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 05:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Although they were twins at different locations, both were at Mars under the same program. Also, each list is short so merging them makes sense. Rowan Forest (talk) 18:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Separate they were in two different places, so merging will be confusing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: But they're locations visited by the same Mars Exploration Rovers mission, and both articles are practically stubs that would be better consolidated into a list-icle about all locations visited by the Mars Exploration Rovers. Not sure why we'd need two stub lists for something that absolutely can be a single list. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 10:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge There were under same program. Both article are not too big that they should be separated. Brown Chocolate (talk) 04:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge because the two rovers are part of the MEV program. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 14:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.