Talk:List of social nudity places in Oceania

Nudity High‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Places Low‑importance

	Australia portal List of social nudity places in Oceania is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Melanesia Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of social nudity places in Oceania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303232236/http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=259&c=743 to http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=259&c=743
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.watoday.com.au/travel/waves-of-fancy-victorias-best-beaches-20081127-6jx2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of social nudity places in Oceania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208134824/http://www.freebeach.com.au/Beach%20List.htm to http://www.freebeach.com.au/Beach%20List.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

@Texttramp: - Since you have taken and interest in this article, thought I would ask: I think the sections outside of Australia and New Zealand could be deleted, since the only (poor) source says its illegal in Polynesia/Micronesia except isolated places where women may be topless, which is not generally thought of as "social nudity".--WriterArtistDC (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WriterArtistDC: I think all of these lists (this one, North America, Europe, Africa, etc.) need a lot of attention. There are so many entries without any citations or possibly even notability. The list for Europe seems completely out of control. They all need a good pruning. Texttramp (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I take that as assent with regard to this article.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 16:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, also added note in lead section clarifying scope of the topic as fully nude recreation. I think the problem with all the lists is that there is no criteria for inclusion. Legally nude locations, certainly, not official but isolated places with a history, perhaps. Someplace mentioned online where someone got away with being naked? No. The minimum for WP:RS would be authored articles on travel sites, and exclude individual user comments such as those in the deleted TripAdvisor citation.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 16:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a very good website for NZ, but not cited for individual beaches before (?). There are so many the list could be broken down by regions, as with Australia.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 19:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand

Public nudity on beaches is generally not enforceable. This sentence means that people cannot generally be forced to be naked in public on beaches. Is this what is intended?

There have been a number of successful legal challenges to being naked in a public area... This means that people who have been naked in a public area have been successfully challenged in court. Again, is this what is intended?

There have been a number of successful legal challenges to being naked in a public area, including cycling and running, so long as there was no intent to offend. This sentence seems to run two or three ideas into one (confused) one. As it stands, it implies that a legal challenge can only be successful if there is NO intent to offend, i.e. a challenge will fail if there IS intent to offend. 118.92.65.155 (talk) 23:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]