Jump to content

Talk:List of psychoactive drugs used by militaries

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of drugs used by militaries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In need of major work

[edit]

I'm not even sure whether this article is worthwhile in its current state, or if it might even be a disservice. I'd put time into addressing it myself but I've got many better things to do. Can't help but think it may as well just be deleted...Use of drugs by military services both presently and historically tends to be covered on the pages about the specific drugs themselves, e.g. the page on methamphetamine describes the use of Pervitin (a methamphetamine brand) during WWII. I think leaving this page in its current state isn't really an option. Improve it or trash it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanisLupisArctus (talkcontribs) 22:27, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. If not fixed by some good Samaritan in say, 30 days, trash it. It is unreadable as is. Seligne (talk) 14:08, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs major updates

[edit]

Table seems broken, making small edits to text moves things around, and the larger edit I did seems to have merged parts of the article together. This page might be considered a stub, or unnecessary to have its own page. Maryshelagh (talk) 05:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]