This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Once again we are being short-sighted as to this discussion. Why are you focusing just on this single article when there are at least a dozen in any conversation regarding any Indian/Pakistani team's first class players who fall into this category? I challenge you and others to send every such article to AfD. Exclusionism only appears to exist when it suits the exclusionists. You have to wonder what they think the project's goals are. Cough. Bobo.11:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Like I've said many times, these articles should exist for every place-name first-class team, to save these discussions happening every single time. Bobo.11:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of the 11 who are blue linked, three are clearly notable. I would merge all the others - I don't think there's a single case where we know anything other than a name and the match they played for PAF. That's not enough for a stand alone biography and everything that we know can be summarised in three lines in a table. No need to AfD they are clearly merge candidates. Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Clearly"? That just goes to show how much nonsense these fake criteria are. There is no "clearly". There is "yes" and "no". Anyone who believes otherwise is working against the goals of the project. Bobo.11:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you're so keen to do this then do this with every non-English first-class team please. While spending the time sending thousands of other articles to deletion. I'm still suspicious why you take offence to indiviudal articles when you're so familiar with this project that you know how to find dozens of others. Have fun. :) Bobo.11:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
