Talk:List of national parks of Norway

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Forest cover is larger

The actual forest cover in Norway is 37% of the land area according to official sources (direktorate for nature management), 21% of the land is covered by conifer forest (barskog) and 16% deciduous forest (løvskog). And this data is a few years old, so today is probably one or two percent more due to lack of grazing in higher altitudes and warmer summers.Orcaborealis (talk) 08:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Readdition of the link

Please consider the readdition of the deleted link to the website covering all existing and planned national parks on Norway on www.garycki.com The reason for the deletion was the anti-spam crucade (self-promotion criteria). I doubt there is another website covering pictures of all national parks of Norway in such a detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.60.217.12 (talk) 10:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts adding this link

195.60.217.12 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
195.26.72.129 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Here are some violations relating to this situation:

SPAM
- External link spamming
- Source soliciting
External links policy
- Advertising and conflicts of interest
Conflict of interest
- Editors who have a conflict of interest
- Accounts used for promotion
What Wikipedia is not
- Wikipedia is not a repository for links
- Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising
Wikipedia:BLOCK#Disruption
- Persistent spamming
- Accounts that appear, based on their edit history, to exist for the sole or primary purpose of promoting a person, company, product, service, or organization in apparent violation of Conflict of interest or anti-spam guidelines.

External links policy on Advertising and conflicts of interest states You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent. Unfortunately the conflict of interest editing involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote garycki.com. Such a conflict is strongly discouraged. this users contributions to wikipedia under IP 195.60.217.12 and IP 195.26.72.129, consist entirely of adding external links to garycki.com and is considered WP:Spam. Looking through the contributions as a whole, the all seem to be garycki.com related only. It has become apparent that your account and IP's are only being used for self-promotion. Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" or a "vehicle for advertising". Avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines.You're here to improve Wikipedia -- not just to promote garycki.com right? --Hu12 (talk) 13:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More on National Parks of Norway

Pawel,

As you can see, User:Hu12 (talk) replied on your links to photos to List of National Parks of Norway with an explanation of the policy. Of the things he says, the one which makes most sense to me is that links to Wikipedia are mostly used for references.

Your photos are excellent and would be valuable additions to the articles. If you are interested in seeing them added directly to the articles you can upload them at [Upload your own work] and we can them use them directly in the article. I do this with all my photos.

You do have to select a user name to do so, but registering is pretty easy - and as you can see from the above, we're all pretty traceable regardless, so the name is a convenience for us. By the way, once you select a user name you can sign your messages, just by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message.

Should you want to go that way and have questions about how to do so, please give me a yell. I'm in and out, but will help if I can.

Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 14:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

links, with exception to references, cannot improve the encyclopedia or article itself. I agree with Williamborg, uploading photos is an excellent way to contribute and help build the encyclopedia.--Hu12 (talk) 15:11, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New park

Please note that no:Ormtjernkampen nasjonalpark has been included in the new, larger no:Langsua nasjonalpark this august; see dirnat.no and dirnat.no/langsua (both in norwegian) Bw --Orland (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of national parks of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/65uFT8vgO?url=http://www.dirnat.no/attachment.ap?id=1043 to http://www.dirnat.no/attachment.ap?id=1043
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dirnat.no/attachment.ap?id=2109

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of national parks of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dirnat.no/attachment.ap?id=1043
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dirnat.no/attachment.ap?id=2109
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100514094146/http://www.nasjonalparksenter.no/english to http://www.nasjonalparksenter.no/english
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927000029/http://www.dirnat.no/content.ap?thisId=29 to http://www.dirnat.no/content.ap?thisId=29

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on List of national parks of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lofotodden

This NP should be moved from "Planned" to "Current". – KWiki (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]