Talk:List of Lockheed aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This page, as noted in the comment of my edit, is woefully incomplete. My vision for this page is to list every single model number used by Lockheed for identifying all of their aircraft, from the original Vega to the F-117, at least, before the company merged with Martin Marietta. I also intend to find the first flight of all of these aircraft, even if the separate article for these aircraft do not mention them. Willy Logan 05:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've filled this list in to the best of my ability, and I think it lists every aircraft between 1927 and 1995. I still need to find dates of the first flight for many of these aircraft. Willy Logan 23:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

F-35

added F-35 JSF — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.31.18.139 (talk • contribs) 6:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Untitled (2)

Be advised Lockheed used several different designation systems, including the "Basic Model Number", the one starting at 1, up to 99, which could be modified into the "Modified Basic Model Number" - which included the version by prefixing the BMN with extra digits (as shown with your Lightning overview), but also several other ranges like the CL- prefixed designations - which probably are more design studies; the commercial designations (like L-100 for the Hercules or L-1011 for the TriStar); the "remainder" including the L-140, which later became the L-80 series (P-80/F-80/T-33 etc) or L-188 Electra. It is not always clear in which system a given designation belongs.

--Antheii 00:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

F-35 (2)

Can we have a consensus on this? The List of Lockheed aircraft is meant for aircraft designs predating the Lockheed/Martin merger. The F-35, which first flew last year, is descended from the X-35, which dates back to the Joint Strike Fighter contract signed in 1996, after the Lockheed/Martin merger in 1995. So the F-35 in no way is a Lockheed product; it is distinctly Lockheed Martin.

I'm leaving the F-35 on the list right now because I don't want to start a revert war. Willy Logan 18:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PV-2 model

What about the PV-2, seems to be missing from the list. I don't know its model number in the listing scheme here. See Lockheed Ventura article which describes 4 models:

1.1 Lockheed Ventura/B-34 Lexington
1.2 Lockheed B-37
1.3 PV-1 Ventura
1.4 PV-2 Harpoon

And see new article Lockheed PV-2 Harpoon No. 37396 whose main source document, a NRHP application, will describe how this is a Lockheed example. doncram (talk) 06:38, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Lockheed aircraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]