Talk:Lillie Bridge Depot

Trains: Rapid transit / in UK / in London High‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Mid-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fellow Wikipedians, this article needs urgent expansion as its fate is now sealed. It is, however, a historic juncture in the history of the capital's railways. Please help. Thanks --Po Kadzieli (talk) 21:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

I have assessed the article against the criteria for B-class:

Suitably referenced, with inline citations
Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
Defined structure, with adequate lead
Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images
Appropriately understandable

As it meets these criteria, I am awarding it B-class. Bob1960evens (talk) 14:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced additions

Several of the recent additions to the article are not adequately supported by references.

(also scheduled for demolition, but currently used by the developer as their "Exhibition Rooms") is not supported by Railway Archives, 1907, and is not relevant to developments in 1907. It should be in the Redevelopment section.
as are the RMT union and the Save Earl's Court campaign" is not supported by Hill 2006.
once contained a realistic mock-up of a tube station for staff training purposes is not supported by Howells 2014.

I have marked them with a fact template. Bob1960evens (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]