Jump to content

Talk:LibertyLink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Liberty Link)

Deletion?

[edit]

Liberty Link is an important gene, and it should not be deleted as it is notable and thousands of farmers use it.

there was a hangon tag on the page, but it was removed when I added the above text so I don't know what was going on. This article shouldn't be deleted.

There is currently no attempt to delete the article. As a result, there is no need for a hangon tag. There are of course, no future guarantees, but assuming the recently-added article's references are verifiable (they seem okay to me), the article should be around for some time to come. On behalf of the Wikipedia community, thanks for the contribution. Truthanado (talk) 21:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I am trying to make the page title LibertyLink as the title. This page should be deleted and Liberty Link should be redirected.Jasonanaggie (talk) 02:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LibertyLink (gene). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]