Talk:Liberation of Peter/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:27, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Dates need references.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):

The article fails to cover the "depiction in art" in sufficient detail. The iconography of the depiction is needed (See Thirty pieces of silver where a para though brief addresses this issue): the sleeping soldiers, the handcuffs in some paintings, the actions of the angel like leading Peter by his hand et al....
Why was Peter put into prison by King Herod, needs to be told too for some context? If someone would be arrested for murder, may be an angel wouldn't come for rescue.

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The img captions need year as well as a brief description highlighting the iconography.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Context is needed for F. F. Bruce etc. Write something like "The Biblical scholar F. F. Bruce argues that..." to establish the importance of his views
"Other references" is a collection of unrelated sentences, which should be remodelled have a definite flow. It needs reorganization, may be a different title: "commemoration"???
Online sources like [1], [2]; [3] says some church claims to have the chains that Peter was tied in..

In conclusion, the article needs more depth and better organization and flow as in GA Thirty pieces of silver. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:27, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]