Jump to content

Talk:Let LF-109 Pionýr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Let LF-109 Pionyr)

Badly written stub

[edit]

Lack of information and referencing (what referencing?) Propose that if this isn't rewritten then should be deleted. See Slingsby Tandem Tutor for how an article on a glider should be written. Pandaplodder (talk) 08:07, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then perhaps you should rewrite it? Be bold. WackyWace converse | contribs 11:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving on

[edit]

I removed the one reference as this led to nothing but technical data which did not substantiate anything in the text of the article. I have placed an external link for some photos of said glider aircraft.

To do

[edit]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Let LF-109 Pionýr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]