Talk:Legal OnRamp
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This article needs good refs. In a quick search I found numerous ones. I have deleted/relocated/ and in some cases rewritten parts of this article. The subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia - but the article needs improvement... Leoniana (talk) 20:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
"helping to strengthen the firm's position as one of the most innovative law firms" - this needs a citation or should be deleted. I have changed the 'endorsements' section to read 'publicity' as many of the articles cited don't actually endorse LOR. This page smacks particularly of the LOR marketing department. They should take another look and try to be more balanced.User67 10:53, 22 April 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.79.250.250 (talk)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
[edit]I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)