Talk:Lê Văn Duyệt/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

  Minor question: is the "goddes" mentioned in the Family and personal life section supposed to be "goddess?" Also, in the Conflict section, there's the word "rorting;" is that a typo as well (or just something I'm not familiar with)?

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

  There's one line in the legacy section that needs a citation. I added a {{cn}} to point out where it is.

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

  Images all look good.

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

  Excellent work on this article, which is quite interesting to read. There's just a couple typos and the one missing footnote holding the article up from passing. I made a series of edits to the article, you might want to check and make sure everything is correct. Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Citations added as you requested and I also fixed some typo. Thank a lot for your review.--AM ^(talk) 16:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Ok, everything looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)