Talk:Last Man Standing season 8/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

"Promotional poster" → "Promotional poster for the season"
Add a comma after "January 2, 2020".
A reference is needed for Jet Jurgensmeyer returning to the series. If one is found, add the fact to #Casting.
Couldn't find any issues with #Cast.
"with her first, like" → "with her first like"
"Chuck is all for it, but" → "Chuck is all for it but"
"Vanessa, and has a great" → "Vanessa and has a great"
"she can stop snoring, but" → "she can stop snoring but"
"Ed, Chuck and others" → "Ed, Chuck, and others"
"because he's lonely" → "that he's lonely"
"Chuck, Kyle, Mandy, Kristin and Ryan" → "Chuck, Kyle, Mandy, Kristin, and Ryan"
"take up sides" → "take sides"
"out of the race, but" → "out of the race but"
"This irritates Kyle, and" → "This irritates Kyle and"
"Vanessa, Mandy, Kristin and Jen" → "Vanessa, Mandy, Kristin, and Jen"
"a rude waiter at lunch, and" → "a rude waiter at lunch and"
"that season would" → "that the season would"
Move the first reference after Thursday Night Football to after WWE SmackDown.
The use of "it was revealed" seems repetitive. Try changing it to something else.
"On December 22, 2019" → "The following day"
The reference for "Yours, Wine, and Ours" seems to have a small typo that made the citation be in italics.
3.646 Archived 2020-02-21 at the Wayback Machine rounds up to 3.65, not 3.64. Change the number both in #Episodes and #Viewing figures.
The "DVR 18-49" digit for "Baked Sale" should be 0.5, not 0.4, and the "total viewers" should be 5.93, not 5.92.
The "Total (18-49)" digit for "Chili Chili Bang Bang" should be 1.3, not 1.4.
The "total viewers" for "Keep the Change" should be 5.85, not 5.84.
The "DVR 18-49" digit for "The Big LeBaxter" should be 0.3, not 0.4.
The "DVR 18-49" digit for "How You Like Them Pancakes?" should be 0.4, not 0.3.

Overview

Notes

@TheTVExpert: This article is well-written but has some small issues to address. I have added most, if not all of my comments, so please ping me back when you have addressed them and/or added your own comments. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 21:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No need to ping anymore, I have seen your edit and have passed the article. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Sounds good. Thanks again for reviewing it. TheTVExpert (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed