Talk:Large-scale brain network

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 27 January 2016 by reviewer Dodger67 (talk · contribs).

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 September 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MarKelly94.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clarifications

Isn't the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop also a large-scale brain network, in the same sense of the others presented here? And what about the Reward Pathway - and of course there are others as well. As far as I understand there is no clear-cut classification system (neuroscientists use pathway, circuit, network, and system interchangeably without ever bothering to make a proper classification), and the "large-scale brain network" is a class that one of you wiki editors came up with to introduce some order, which of course was a very good idea, but this should probably be mentioned somewhere (as I have never seen this class mentioned in any article or book), and also someone needs to give an overview of the whole hierarchy: neuron->pathway->circuit/network(I guess the two are predominantly equivalent)->LSBN->whatever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:5019:2600:D4F3:C9EE:9ACF:4821 (talk) 21:53, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Large-Scale Brain Networks are a relatively discovery in neural science. You can learn more about them if you use Google Scholar, or scientific journals. MarKelly94 (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move some stuff from Biology_of_depression??

This section has a lot of good information, but, it is written with a focus on depression. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_of_depression#Large-scale_brain_network_theory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodysurfinyon (talk • contribs) 21:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another set of slightly different networks

http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19250 primary sensorimotor cortex, primary visual and extra-striate visual network, fronto-parietal lateralized networks, default mode network, attentional frontoparietal networks, executive control, auditory networks, hippocampal and thalamic formations. These are not the same labels as in the image, which were: Somatosensory, DMN, Attentional L & R, Hippocampal, Visual, Thalamic, Associative, Executive, Auditory/Language.

http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011 - shows ICA parcellations of 7 & 17 networks.

Bodysurfinyon (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Task Positive Network

I removed these two sentences about the task positive network. This is an alternate model of the large-scale networks that has it's own page.

Two large scale brain networks, namely the task-positive network and the default mode network, appear to be anti-correlated. In other words, when either of these large scale brain networks are activated the other large scale brain network demonstrates diminished activity.[4]

Additionally, competition between the task-positive network and the default mode network at the time of memory encoding has been shown to result in poor long-term memory consolidation in healthy controls.[6]

Bodysurfinyon (talk) 02:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

components of memory is not directly related to brain networks

There are also models suggesting that “components of memory representation are distributed widely across different parts of the brain as mediated by multiple neocortical circuits”.^[1] Bodysurfinyon (talk) 03:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Ofengenden, Tzofit (2014) Memory formation and belief. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences, 7(2):34-44 http://www.crossingdialogues.com/Ms-A14-03.pdf

Common network names vs. the anatomical names

I am swapping the anatomical and common names in the headings, because that is how they appear in the literature most often. This quote is from the Uddin paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325607/

In our proposed taxonomy, networks are referred to by anatomical names that best describe six ubiquitous large-scale functional systems. The names in blue refer to the broad cognitive domains with which a given anatomical system is most commonly associated. Bodysurfinyon (talk) 17:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Workgroup for HArmonized Taxonomy of NETworks (WHATNET)

Controversies and current progress on large-scale brain network nomenclature from OHBM WHATNET: Workgroup for HArmonized Taxonomy of NETworks, Lucina Q. Uddin et al.

Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Preprints - says we need to wait to add WHATNET, but it is so cool...

https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/25za6 Bodysurfinyon (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WHATNET authors put out a tools that helps correlate different atlases. This needs to added when it is published.

A network correspondence toolbox for quantitative evaluation of novel neuroimaging results

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.17.599426v1 Bodysurfinyon (talk) 03:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Ofengenden, Tzofit (2014) Memory formation and belief. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences, 7(2):34-44 http://www.crossingdialogues.com/Ms-A14-03.pdf

[1]