Talk:Langmuir

Untitled

I think the example is wrong by a factor 100. I believe it should be either 0.53 seconds or 2.5 * 10^-8 mbar. Paul 10:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, the example is correct, since it is supposed to be 100L, not 1L. -- Spireguy 17:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Separate disambig?

I think this page should be purely a disambig page, and the unit info (merged with the current Langmuirs article) should be under Langmuir (unit). Comments? -- Spireguy 17:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This needs doing. I suggest this be done in 5 days unless consensus here says otherwise. --Bduke 23:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It basically already is a disambig page. Move the Langmuirs page to Langmuir (unit), or some such, and make this a disambig.129.22.166.188 01:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]