Talk:Landfill diversion

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sanitation Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

--Alex 09:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I think we should talk about different ways in which you can save landfill space. Maybe even talk about the cost and currently how succesfull it is. Also talk about other countries with succesfull diversion policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPTulacka (talk • contribs) 19:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC) I think we should divide up the different types of recycling into different catergories and elaborate on their costs and beneifits.JPTulacka (talk) 19:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded on biomass a little just for a little more background on it.JPTulacka (talk) 18:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yaanti. Peer reviewers: Tah1293, Yaanti.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

landfill

There are many things that people can do to divert landfills, but no one is really taking action, or good use of all the options we have.Amey1378 (talk) 16:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landfill diversion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130722145116/http://greendashboard.dc.gov/Waste/WasteDivertedFromLandfills to http://greendashboard.dc.gov/Waste/WasteDivertedFromLandfills

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neomalthusian or eugenicist?

If landfills have increased in number, then we are not doing enough to combat the growing population – is this NPOV,really? Why did the author assume that population growth needs combatting? If it does indeed, there have been such attempts in the past, but the uproar from groups targeted for 'reduction' is still rampant to this day. So the dilemma is: whom do we start from, and why.--212.109.146.81 (talk) 12:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greenwashing?

The article promotes official narratives with no attempt at criticism. Waste diversion is simply assumed to be good for the environment when that may not be the case. Recycling is resource intensive and produces toxic waste. Sometimes it is worse than making goods from raw materials. Also some of the wording is grade school level in structure and argumentative in nature. It reads like a school project.--ෆාට් බුබුල (talk) 05:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]