This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Have done cleanup. Of the 24 staff linked, 20 were redlinks. Of he four emaining, only one was to the correct person. One name was disambig'd to a redlink. I've culled the listing down to senior staff. --RedHillian (talk) 00:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is scope for a proper article here but contributor leponline (presumably a worker at the newspaper) continues to remove anything that can be construed as criticism of the newspaper and places a long, meaningless, list of names. This is not in the spirit of Wikipedia and could be classed as vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kl4s68 (talk • contribs) 12:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
