Talk:La Sexta 3

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move 24 December 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: procedural close. Nothing to do here - the article already shows a lowercase l. (non-admin closure) Brad v 18:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LaSexta 3 → laSexta3 – I have confused, the correct name is laSexta3 Vivaelcelta (talk • contributions) 02:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 16 January 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to La Sexta 3 (with spaces). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

laSexta 3 → laSexta3 – I have confused, the correct name is laSexta3, all together, without spaces. Vivaelcelta (talk • contributions) 17:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. JudgeRM (talk to me) 19:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Moscow Connection moved the page to the current spot citing "MOS:TM and a discussion at the Spanish Wikipedia". I would like to see some consensus for this page move before I do move it, if it develops. JudgeRM (talk to me) 19:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't move it to the current spot, I moved it to "La Sexta 3". And I believe it is where it should be according to MOS:TM. See this discussion at Jorgemg14's talk page: User talk:Jorgemg14#Los 40.
Move to La Sexta 3. --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose move per MOS:TM. I do see the reasoning behind all above posters, but CamelCase is explicitly a judgement call. I think it should stay as is. ONR (talk) 07:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean. What reasoning did you see behind my comment?
My reasoning and that of the people in the Spanish Wikipedia is that "LaSexta" means simply "The Sixth" in Spanish. And that "LaSexta" (written like this) is simply an attractive trademark.
Also, "LaSexta" and "La Sexta" are often used interchangeably. The LaSexta official website (lasexta.com) is titled "LA SEXTA TV" (see the page title in the title bar). --Moscow Connection (talk) 09:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Correction:
I made a mistake in my message above. I should have written "laSexta", not "LaSexta". This is how it is officially stylized. --Moscow Connection (talk) 11:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, "LaSexta 3" or "laSexta 3" is the worst possible choice for the article's title, cause it is neither the official way to write it ("laSexta3"), nor proper Spanish ("La Sexta 3"). --Moscow Connection (talk) 11:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move back to La Sexta 3 (with spaces). It appears that the removal of spaces is only stylistic, and therefore should be avoided per MOS:TM. This also brings it back in line with the Spanish Wikipedia. Brad v 05:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move back to La Sexta 3 (with spaces) per MOS:TM In ictu oculi (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Sexta 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140503234816/http://www.lasexta.com/sexta3/ to http://www.lasexta.com/sexta3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]